80sTees.com, Inc. announced a data cut that was much larger than originally thought. The online retailer originally reported the cut in april of 2013 to customers whose credit card numbers had been used fraudulently. Since that time, the retailer's investigation uncovered that the reach of the exposure to customer credit card info was larger than originally believed. The companionship has notified any customer who used the site from June 3, 2012 through april 30, 2013 that their credit card may have been used fraudulently. Originally the troupe was contacted by Discover card requesting an investigation due to some unauthorized charges experienced by Discover cards customers. The fellowship completed their own investigation and on february 27, 2013 learned that a small number of Visa customers had also experienced unauthorized charges. On march 6, 2013 Mastercard also contacted the troupe regarding fraudulent charges against their citation card holders.The fellowship hired a forensic investigator who discovered that the companionship had been a victim of a cyber onslaught that gained access to and installed malware on their website server in eary June 2012. Their anitvirus and malware scans did not detect the malware. april 3, 2013 the troupe notified approximately 3,503 customers of the hack. This is the total that was reported to the companion by the credit card companies. On april 22, 2013, the fellowship received a account from the forensic investigator that 2,598 credit cards were compromised. On April 30, 2013 the fellowship received calls from ii customers stating that their cards had been compromised. The companion investigated those customers' complaints and reported the issuing to the secret Service. The secret service asked the company to not ply any additional notice until their investigation had been completed.The secret service investigation uncovered that the hackers had localise up an unauthorized email account that captured the company's credit card transactions without their knowledge. The secret service could not definitely read who the hacker or hackers were. Based on the information the company received, they believed it to live a former high level employee who has since died.