Hack Notice

Hack Notice: A leak report quietly disappears, leaving questions in its wake

A leak report quietly disappears, leaving questions in its wake

On october 8, Jeremiah Fowler reported that he had discovered a non-password protected database that contained what appeared to be information regarding healthcare workers and traveling nurses. If you had register the account on surety discovery at the time, you would have scan that almost one trillion multitude were potentially affected. Based on that reporting, DataBreaches.net reached out to Freedom Healthcare to inquire whether they would live notifying colorado regulators of the leak. in response, their external counsel called me and emailed me, saying, “We believe there are inaccuracies in [the reporting].” DataBreaches.net agreed to hold off posting anything to spring them time to respond more fully to Fowler’s report. On october 28, i received their statement, which i am reproducing in full. I’ll get some comments on the other side and Fowler’s response. This comment is in connection with a cybersecurity incident that occurred on September 15, 2019. Freedom Healthcare has been in the process of migrating our contact management system from i third party vendor to another. a parcel of the old database which was stored on our previous authorized vendor’s servers was not migrating properly by our new vendor and, to remedy this, our vendor extracted a small parcel of that data to handle separately as trial data. Unfortunately, the technical vendor inadvertently left the prove data on a publicly accessible server. The publicly accessible server was not controlled by Freedom Healthcare but rather our vendor. The examine data included personal identifiable information (“PII”) of less than 90 persons who work in the healthcare sector. While this event is something we submit very seriously, it is markedly different situation than what was initially reported in some of the blogs and spring the basis your request for comment. We were informed of our technical vendor’s error by Security Discovery, “ethical hackers” who appropriately neither examined it deeply or copied it to their servers. Upon being informed, we immediately took litigate and our vendor promptly restricted access to the data. in coordination with our technical vendor and other concealment and cyber security consultants, the investigation revealed that the data was only publicly available for a very limited time, that it was not downloaded or copied in any manner, and that no persons, other than Security uncovering and other authorized users (who had access to the information regardless) accessed or reviewed the data in the limited time that it was publicly available. Based upon these conclusions, and because it contained incorrect information, Security discovery removed their posting. From the investigation findings, we doh not believe there is a legal duty to describe this incident, and doh not believe that the individuals whose PII was available are at any risk. However, the transgress notification laws are in flux and thus, out of an abundance of caution, we are notifying those individuals whose PII was available. freedom Healthcare takes the privateness of its employees and customers very seriously and we are committed to ensuring their protection. piece this incident is best described as a “near miss”, we are working with our technical vendor and cyber-security experts to protect against something like this from happening again. We are grateful for the services of certificate discovery and the role ethical hackers gambol in our society. They supply a valuable service in ensuring data protection. Based on their statement provided to this site, freedom Healthcare seems to be acknowledging that there was a misconfiguration (by a vendor) and that personal info was exposed. They also appear to acknowledge that they learned of it because of Fowler’s notification to them. Apart from attributing the error to a vendor and not to their have employees, it seems like the biggest dissension with Fowler’s reporting was one of numbers. He claimed that 957,000 had data exposed. They take fewer than 90. So why didn’t Fowler just egress a correction and apology if that was the issuing (if he had actually made an error in the numbers that they could prove)? why did surety uncovering just silently remove their carry with no explanation at all? And what about all the sites that had linked to that account and reported his stated findings? DataBreaches.net contacted Security Discovery to ask why they removed their report. And that’s when things got even more confusing, because it seems they removed their carry because they didn’t experience enough data to show that the data were real and not “test data.” Fowler explained, in part: As a policy we do not download the data we discover and only take a very small sample of documents for verification purposes. The same day it was published, i got a call from their lawyer who said that they insist it was internal test data. […] Unfortunately, i can not formalize with confidence that the data was not trial data as they said, so i redacted the article. Maybe the data were being used for testing migration, but by freedom Healthcare’s argument to this site, those were real data on some healthcare workers. It seems that Fowler removed the report based on freedom Healthcare’s initial claim that the data was (only) “internal trial data.” But “internal test data” can be real data. When entities tell researchers (or journalists) that something was only “test data,” we need to comply up by asking if they mean real individuals’ data being used for testing purposes or if they are claiming that the data itself is fake/fabricated data not tied to real individuals. Fowler seems to have found a real exposure, although the number of individuals exposed may be in controversy. Maybe he shouldn’t have been so quick to just remove the article. It might get been better to update it to say that it was under review. But Fowler gets the last word on this one, as he realized that in the future, they need to download and preserve more proof of leaks to support their reporting. He wrote to me: As i am sure you understand, our focusing is on data […]

About HackNotice and A leak report quietly disappears, leaving questions in its wake

HackNotice is a service that notices trends and patterns in publically available data so as to identify possible data breaches, leaks, hacks, and other data incidents on behalf of our clients. HackNotice monitors data streams related to breaches, leaks, and hacks and A leak report quietly disappears, leaving questions in its wake was reported by one of those streams. HackNotice may also have the breach date, hack date, the hacker responsible, the hacked industry, the hacked location, and any other parts of the hack, breach, or leak that HackNotice can report on for the consumers of our product.

If you are a user of A leak report quietly disappears, leaving questions in its wake their products, services, websites, or applications and you were a client of HackNotice, monitoring for A leak report quietly disappears, leaving questions in its wake you may have been alerted to this report about A leak report quietly disappears, leaving questions in its wake . HackNotice is a service that provides data, information, and monitoring that helps our clients recover from and remediate data breaches, hacks, and leaks of their personal information. HackNotice provides a service that helps our clients know what to do about a hack, breach, or leak of their information.

If A leak report quietly disappears, leaving questions in its wake had a breach of consumer data or a data leak, then there may be additional actions that our clients should read to protect their digital identity. Data breaches, hacks, and leaks often top to and cause identity theft, account accept overs, ransomware, spyware, extortion, and malware. account takeovers are often caused by credential reuse, watchword reuse, easily guessed passwords, and are facilitated by the sharing of billions of credentials and other customer information through data leaks, as the direct resultant of data breaches and hacks.

HackNotice monitors trends in publically available data that indicates tens of thousands of data breaches each year, along with billions of records from data leaks each year. On behalf of our clients, HackNotice works to monitor for hacks that lead to lower client surety and digital identities that have been exposed and should be considered vulnerable to attack. HackNotice works with clients to identify the extent that digital identities have been exposed and provides remediation suggestions for how to handle each type of exposure.

HackNotice monitors the hacker community, which is a network of individuals that part data breaches, hacks, leaks, malware, spyware, ransomware, and many other tools that are often used for financial fraud, account take overs, and further breaches and hacks. HackNotice monitors the hacker community specifically for breaches, hacks, and data leaks that hurt consumers. HackNotice applies industry specific knowledge and advanced security practices to monitor for trends that point breaches, hacks, and exposed digital identities.

HackNotice also enables clients to share jade notices with their friend, family, and collogues to help increment cognizance around alleged hacks, breaches, or data leaks. HackNotice works to provide clients with sharable reports to help increase the security of our clients personal network. The security of the people that our clients interact with directly impacts the layer of surety of our clients. Increased photograph to accounts that have been taken over by hackers leads to further account have overs through phishing, malware, and other attach techniques.

If you found this hack notice to be helpful, then you may live interested in reading some additional cut notices such as:

eceive notification for loss and unauthorized acquisition of health information. The United States ainformation are increasingly common in the United States. Although such incidentm's subscription to a credit reporting agency, for instance, new credit cards, or other instruments.

2 health data hacks hit Florida Blue, Aegis Medical members - Orlando Sentinel

City of Norman, OK temporarily suspends utility payment portal; ditches Click2Gov after another potential security incident

A leak report quietly disappears, leaving questions in its wake